🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to employ a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include several five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and disturbing the delicate equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its decision.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to employ the districts created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision comes amid a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican control. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield several more conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives lamented the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic leader argued the court had once again damaged its credibility by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.